In the hierarchy

1. Part I: Technical & System Concerns
2. D3. Security & Adversarial Risk
3. 3.1 Prompt injection & jailbreaks

Virtues and principles to explore

Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.

• Stewardship

  Service

  Hold what is built in trust for those who will live with it.

• Prudence

  Excellence

  Small, reversible steps before irreversible ones.

• Accountability

  Trust

  Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.

Starter questions

Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.

1. 01What might we be missing if we treat “Audio prompt injection” only as a technical problem?
2. 02If a colleague raised this concern tomorrow, how would we receive it as inquiry rather than accusation?
3. 03What capacity would we need — in people, in the institution, in the tools — to meet this well?
4. 04What would Accountability require of us here, before we proceed?

Also on this branch

• Direct prompt injection20
• Indirect prompt injection20
• Cross-context prompt injection25
• Visual prompt injection20
• Tool-response injection16
• RAG document injection16

Frameworks and sources

• OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10 (2026)framework
• MITRE ATLASframework