In the hierarchy

1. Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
2. D19. Rights, Law & Justice
3. 19.1 Intellectual property

Virtues and principles to explore

Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.

• Justice

  Justice

  Who is heard, who is harmed, and who decides.

• Accountability

  Trust

  Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.

• Dignity

  Center principle

  Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.

Starter questions

Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.

1. 01What capacity would we need — in people, in the institution, in the tools — to meet this well?
2. 02What would Dignity require of us here, before we proceed?
3. 03What might we be missing if we treat “Copyright in training” only as a technical problem?
4. 04If a colleague raised this concern tomorrow, how would we receive it as inquiry rather than accusation?

Also on this branch

• Copyright of AI outputs9
• Trademark and passing off9
• Trade-secret protection for models9
• Patent-eligibility of AI inventions9
• Right of publicity/likeness9
• Moral rights of authors9

Frameworks and sources

• EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
• Council of Europe AI Conventionregulation
• International humanitarian law (IHL)framework

  The body of law that governs the conduct of armed conflict and the protection of people who are not fighting, which applies to AI used in or for conflict.