In the hierarchy

1. Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
2. D19. Rights, Law & Justice
3. 19.2 Liability & product law

Virtues and principles to explore

Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.

• Justice

  Justice

  Who is heard, who is harmed, and who decides.

• Accountability

  Trust

  Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.

• Dignity

  Center principle

  Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.

Starter questions

Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.

1. 01What conversation have we not yet had about this — and who needs to be in it?
2. 02Who is served by addressing this, and who benefits if we leave it unnamed?
3. 03Whose experience of Producer liability for AI harms is not yet in the room — and how would we hear it?
4. 04What is already being done about this, and by whom — and how would we find out without assuming?

Also on this branch

• Deployer liability9
• AI Liability Directive (EU)9
• Negligence and duty of care9
• Strict-liability proposals9
• Insurance markets for AI9
• Contractual risk-shifting to buyers9

Who is working on it

Cited for their public writing. Citation is not endorsement, partnership, or affiliation.

• International Committee of the Red Cross

Frameworks and sources

• EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
• Council of Europe AI Conventionregulation
• International humanitarian law (IHL)framework

  The body of law that governs the conduct of armed conflict and the protection of people who are not fighting, which applies to AI used in or for conflict.

• Deciding under algorithms: artificial intelligence and the protection of civilian infrastructure in armed conflictguidance
• ICRC law and policy hub on AIguidance