In the hierarchy

1. Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
2. D19. Rights, Law & Justice
3. 19.3 Human rights & civil liberties

Virtues and principles to explore

Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.

• Justice

  Justice

  Who is heard, who is harmed, and who decides.

• Accountability

  Trust

  Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.

• Dignity

  Center principle

  Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.

Starter questions

Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.

1. 01What conversation have we not yet had about this — and who needs to be in it?
2. 02Who is served by addressing this, and who benefits if we leave it unnamed?
3. 03Whose experience of Right to a remedy is not yet in the room — and how would we hear it?
4. 04What is already being done about this, and by whom — and how would we find out without assuming?

Also on this branch

• Right to privacy under AI surveillance9
• Freedom of expression online9
• Freedom of assembly9
• Non-discrimination law application to AI12
• Rights of the child under AI12
• Rights of persons with disabilities12

Who is working on it

Cited for their public writing. Citation is not endorsement, partnership, or affiliation.

• International Committee of the Red Cross

Frameworks and sources

• EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
• Council of Europe AI Conventionregulation
• International humanitarian law (IHL)framework

  The body of law that governs the conduct of armed conflict and the protection of people who are not fighting, which applies to AI used in or for conflict.

• Deciding under algorithms: artificial intelligence and the protection of civilian infrastructure in armed conflictguidance
• Artificial intelligence and machine learning in armed conflict: a human-centred approachposition paper
• ICRC law and policy hub on AIguidance