In the hierarchy

1. Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
2. D19. Rights, Law & Justice
3. 19.4 Due process

Virtues and principles to explore

Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.

• Justice

  Justice

  Who is heard, who is harmed, and who decides.

• Accountability

  Trust

  Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.

• Dignity

  Center principle

  Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.

Starter questions

Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.

1. 01What is already being done about this, and by whom — and how would we find out without assuming?
2. 02What conversation have we not yet had about this — and who needs to be in it?
3. 03Who is served by addressing this, and who benefits if we leave it unnamed?
4. 04Whose experience of Chain-of-custody for AI-generated evidence is not yet in the room — and how would we hear it?

Also on this branch

• Right to explanation12
• Right to contest12
• Right to human decision-maker9
• Evidence standards for AI outputs9
• Adversarial testing rights for defendants9

Frameworks and sources

• EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
• Council of Europe AI Conventionregulation
• International humanitarian law (IHL)framework

  The body of law that governs the conduct of armed conflict and the protection of people who are not fighting, which applies to AI used in or for conflict.