III · D19 · 19.3
Migrant and refugee rights
Automated border decisions.
Severity
Likelihood
In the hierarchy
- Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
- D19. Rights, Law & Justice
- 19.3 Human rights & civil liberties
Virtues and principles to explore
Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.
Justice
Justice
Who is heard, who is harmed, and who decides.
Accountability
Trust
Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.
Dignity
Center principle
Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.
Starter questions
Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.
- 01Who is served by addressing this, and who benefits if we leave it unnamed?
- 02Whose experience of Migrant and refugee rights is not yet in the room — and how would we hear it?
- 03What is already being done about this, and by whom — and how would we find out without assuming?
- 04What conversation have we not yet had about this — and who needs to be in it?
Also on this branch
Who is working on it
Cited for their public writing. Citation is not endorsement, partnership, or affiliation.
- International Committee of the Red Cross
Frameworks and sources
- EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
- Council of Europe AI Conventionregulation
- International humanitarian law (IHL)framework
The body of law that governs the conduct of armed conflict and the protection of people who are not fighting, which applies to AI used in or for conflict.
- Building a responsible humanitarian approach: the ICRC's policy on artificial intelligenceinstitutional policy
- Deciding under algorithms: artificial intelligence and the protection of civilian infrastructure in armed conflictguidance
- ICRC law and policy hub on AIguidance
See also exemplar policies.
Writing and incidents
Open indexes first. Then, if you wish, ask Grok to search the live web for this concern — one request, cached for the rest of this session.
Rights, remedies, and what the law still cannot see.