III · D23 · 23.1
Mass cyber-attack scenarios
Simultaneous critical-infrastructure disruption.
Catastrophic · 5DocumentedNearRisk 15
Severity
5/5
Likelihood
3/5
In the hierarchy
- Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
- D23. Catastrophic & Existential Risk
- 23.1 Catastrophic misuse
Virtues and principles to explore
Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.
Hope
Hope
Stand in uncertainty, where there is room to act — not in optimism or despair.
Humility
Center principle
The map is larger than any one of us.
Courage
Hope
Act without the comfort of certainty.
Starter questions
Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.
- 01If a colleague raised this concern tomorrow, how would we receive it as inquiry rather than accusation?
- 02What capacity would we need — in people, in the institution, in the tools — to meet this well?
- 03What would Courage require of us here, before we proceed?
- 04What might we be missing if we treat “Mass cyber-attack scenarios” only as a technical problem?
Also on this branch
Frameworks and sources
Writing and incidents
Open indexes first. Then, if you wish, ask Grok to search the live web for this concern — one request, cached for the rest of this session.
Catastrophe, loss of control, and the disagreement about how to think about either.